Webinar: The ADA & Fair Housing: What Property Managers Need to Know
Webinar: The ADA & Fair Housing: What Property Managers Need to Know
Register Now
Upcoming Webinar: Can AI Stop Cargo Theft? What Works, What Doesn't & Where AI Fits Register Now
Upcoming Webinar: Graying Residents — Seniors, Safety & Liability in Property Management Register Now

Multifamily Crime Poll

Car Break-Ins: What Multifamily Operators Are Seeing

Car Break-ins Survey

The following poll was conducted during our Car Break-Ins, Auto Theft, and Legal Liability webinar.

Q1: How frequently do car break-ins occur at your property (or properties you manage)?

Poll Results

Hover over the chart to interact.
Click For Raw Data

Poll Results – Q1: How Frequently Do Car Break-Ins Occur?

  • A few times a year — 24 (39%)
  • Multiple times per month — 11 (18%)
  • Rarely (once a year or less) — 9 (15%)
  • Once a month — 7 (11%)
  • Not sure / No data — 6 (10%)
  • Never — 5 (8%)

Five Key Takeaways

✔
Recurring issue for many. Nearly half of respondents reported incidents at least a few times per year, confirming that car break-ins remain a persistent challenge.
✔
High-frequency hotspots exist. 18% experience break-ins monthly or multiple times per month, indicating certain properties may be targeted repeatedly.
✔
Low but not negligible inactivity. Only 5% have never experienced a break-in, showing that complete immunity is rare.
✔
Data gaps limit awareness. 6% are unsure or have no incident data, suggesting some properties lack adequate tracking or reporting processes.
✔
Opportunity for targeted prevention. The range of incident frequencies highlights the need for adaptable security strategies tailored to each property’s risk profile.
Summary: Most multifamily properties face car break-ins on a recurring basis, with some experiencing frequent incidents. Few are untouched by the issue, and a notable share lack clear incident data. This underscores the importance of proactive security strategies — including tools like AI surveillance and remote guarding — to both deter incidents and improve reporting accuracy for better long-term prevention.

Q2: Beyond the safety of your residents, what is your biggest concern when it comes to parking?

Poll Results

Hover over the chart to interact.
Click For Raw Data

Q2: Biggest Concern About Parking (Beyond Safety)

  • All of the above — 34 (55%)
  • Legal liability if something happens — 8 (13%)
  • Resident attrition due to safety concerns — 8 (13%)
  • Negative online reviews or reputation damage — 4 (6%)
  • Cost of implementing new security — 4 (6%)
  • Increased insurance premiums — 0 (0%)
  • Not a major concern — 4 (6%)

Five Key Takeaways

✔
Parking problems are multi-dimensional. Over half (55%) believe multiple risks - legal, operational, and reputational - are interconnected, so solutions must address all at once.
✔
Legal and retention stakes are high. The top individual concerns were legal liability and resident attrition (13% each), showing both compliance and resident satisfaction drive decision-making.
✔
Cost isn’t the main obstacle. Only 6% saw implementation costs as the biggest issue, suggesting budgets aren’t the primary reason parking issues persist.
✔
Reputation is a secondary effect. Just 6% cited negative reviews as their main worry, implying reputation damage is seen as a consequence of other problems.
✔
Insurance impact is negligible. With 0% selecting increased premiums, stakeholders don’t view parking issues as a driver of insurance costs.
Summary: Respondents view parking challenges as more than just a safety matter, with most recognizing multiple risks spanning legal exposure, resident turnover, and reputational harm. Addressing these concerns requires a holistic strategy, integrating technology such as AI surveillance and remote guarding can help mitigate liability while improving resident satisfaction and community reputation.

Q3: What level of security currently exists in your parking areas?

Poll Results

Hover over the chart to interact.
Click For Raw Data

Q3: What level of security currently exists in your parking areas?

  • Cameras + patrols — 19 (31%)
  • No security presence or surveillance — 15 (24%)
  • Security cameras only — 13 (21%)
  • Cameras + remote monitoring + patrols — 8 (13%)
  • Security patrols only — 7 (11%)

Five Key Takeaways

✔
Hybrid security is most common. The largest group (31%) reported having both cameras and patrols, suggesting many properties favor a blend of surveillance and human presence.
✔
A quarter have no security at all. 24% lack both surveillance and physical presence, representing a significant vulnerability that could be a target for improvement.
✔
Cameras dominate over patrols.  21% have cameras only, compared to just 11% with patrols only, showing a heavier reliance on technology than manpower.
✔
Advanced multi-layer setups are rare. Only 13% use cameras + remote monitoring + patrols, indicating that fully integrated solutions are still uncommon.
✔
Room for tech-human integration. The gap between simple camera setups and fully layered systems suggests opportunities to upgrade properties to smarter, proactive security models.
Summary: Parking security varies widely, from layered camera-patrol systems to no coverage at all. While cameras are prevalent, few properties combine them with remote monitoring and patrols for comprehensive protection. Expanding to include AI-driven surveillance and real-time remote guarding can help close security gaps and deliver around-the-clock deterrence.

Know Your Law

See where and how these laws might affect your property

Turn Insights Into Action

Poll results are valuable — but the real impact comes from applying them.
Schedule a call with Cloudastructure to explore how AI-powered surveillance and remote guarding can help prevent car break-ins, reduce liability, and improve resident safety at your properties.
Request a Demo
End of Year offer
Protect Now, Pay in 2026
Stay ahead of crime this holiday season with Cloudastructure’s AI Surveillance, and defer all payments until 2026.
Claim Offer Now