✔
Physical deterrence remains a primary layer—but not a complete solution. Nearly 30% of responses rely on gates and fences, showing continued dependence on access control despite its known limitations.
✔
Communication plays a supporting, not preventative, role. A quarter of responses involve notices or resident messaging, indicating efforts to address behavior after incidents rather than stopping them in the moment.
✔
Real-time intervention is significantly underrepresented. Only 13% of responses involve immediate alerts and action, highlighting a major gap in AI video surveillance and remote guarding capabilities.
✔
Clear shift opportunity toward proactive security. The distribution shows a strong skew toward delayed or indirect responses, underscoring the need for AI analytics for surveillance to enable faster, more effective intervention.
Summary: When normalized, the data makes it even clearer that multifamily properties overwhelmingly rely on reactive and indirect responses to unauthorized pool access, with minimal adoption of real-time intervention strategies. While access control and post-incident review remain common, they do little to actively prevent incidents as they occur. This gap highlights a critical opportunity for
AI video surveillance, cloud-based surveillance, and
remote video guarding to shift security from reactive to proactive.